tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post351752651137544961..comments2024-02-15T21:11:10.188+13:00Comments on Software Development Journey: Ten Interesting Aspects Of JavaFX ScriptAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14583113629644552123noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-32478036481086140122010-09-16T02:09:19.285+12:002010-09-16T02:09:19.285+12:00some of the main interesting aspects you mentioned...some of the main interesting aspects you mentioned here were told by my buddy <a href="http://www.citratesildenafil.com/" rel="nofollow">Sildenafil Citrate</a> who is an expert in this particular field and I did not understand so much, but I can see you two have similar thoughtsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-7141723741986474742010-06-03T08:08:53.772+12:002010-06-03T08:08:53.772+12:00I have a problem in the javafx composer.I have a c...I have a problem in the javafx composer.I have a class called Count in which I made a variable var temp=60; & I have another class called Gui in which I want to call the variable temp..so can I know how please ??karimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06318411821324229517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-15804334376586922932009-11-02T20:45:28.386+13:002009-11-02T20:45:28.386+13:00Good point Michal. I recently discovered what you ...Good point Michal. I recently discovered what you described, at first it was odd with the way static functions, variables, and constants are done in JavaFX Script. However like you say it is easy to make something like a function static.<br /><br />Also it does seem natural to do it that way instead of marking it with the static keyword. You can more easily tell what is static and what is not since there is a clear separation between the two.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14583113629644552123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-15733708080960040762009-10-27T07:13:21.269+13:002009-10-27T07:13:21.269+13:00Hi,
really nice post, but I have to point one huge...Hi,<br />really nice post, but I have to point one huge mistake.<br /><br />"4. No support for static functions, variables and constants"<br /><br />Of course there is support for static functions and varables in JavaFX. True - there is no "static" key world but it is even simpler then that. If you would like to make function/variable/const static you just put them outside the class declaration.<br /><br />public class MyClass{<br /> public function memberFunction(){<br /> }<br />}<br /><br />public function staticFunction(){<br />}<br /><br />var staticVar;<br /><br />def STATIC_CONST; <br /><br /><br />and thats it. You can call/access them with:<br /><br />MyClass.staticFunction();<br />MyClass.staticVar;<br />MyClass.STATIC_CONST; <br /><br />Regards!<br />MichalMichal Margielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04191448659080996000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-49436773081209686502009-10-21T22:53:12.890+13:002009-10-21T22:53:12.890+13:00All fair points apart from the bit about XML. The...All fair points apart from the bit about XML. The widespread use of XML alongside Java is precisely because Java is so bad for programming in a declarative style. JavaFX fixes that. Why would you use an irritatingly verbose document format to write programs instead of a purpose-built declarative programming language? His trivial example looks fine but doesn't contain any code to perform actions, only declarative layout code. How would he propose to encode that in XML? XML makes a very bad programming language as anyone who's worked on a moderately compliated Ant build will testify.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.zoombits.co.uk/batteries" rel="nofollow">battery</a>Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13395168684012391682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-60203005904660543182009-10-12T05:33:17.649+13:002009-10-12T05:33:17.649+13:00Please, anyone,say Josh Marinacci, his program at ...Please, anyone,say Josh Marinacci, his program at javafx.com has an error!<br /><br />Program which calculate prime factors.<br /><br />The incorrect part interacts with java threads.<br /><br />2 is not counted and the result is less than correct -> 78497 vs 78498<br /><br />I wrote him to joshy@joshy.org , but no answer...Anatolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05219816084832436943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-30068356669053546422009-09-30T12:43:58.900+13:002009-09-30T12:43:58.900+13:00Just to clarify deferAction() doesn't cause th...Just to clarify deferAction() doesn't cause the action to be executed on a background thread, it just says 'run this function 'later' on the Event Dispatching Thread'. <br /><br />And in my experience, 'almost later' is pretty much immediately. <br /><br />If you want to run something in the background, you need to look at javafx.async.Taskahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00287907095377805335noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6809771297766259367.post-29480320738686226352009-09-30T12:27:40.088+13:002009-09-30T12:27:40.088+13:00Nice!!!
missed some things like triggers!!Nice!!!<br /><br />missed some things like triggers!!Williamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12980844418405775676noreply@blogger.com